Found a bug, asking for help? Use cf-support to collect info quickly.
cf-support was born from interactions supporting Enterprise customers to streamline data collection and was introduced in late 2022 with the release of 3.18.31 and 3.21.02. Furthermore, it was featured on The Agent is In3 episode 21 Troubleshooting with cf-support. It gathers various details about the system and creates an archive that you can attach to your ticket. While its inception was geared towards Enterprise customers, it’s still both useful and available for community users as well.
Did you know you can include one policy file from another?
Traditionally you specify the files you want to make up a policy set using inputs in body common control found in your policy entry (promises.cf by default).
body common control { # Paths are relative to $(sys.policy_entry_dirname) if not # fully qualified inputs => { "path/to/policy-1.cf", "path/to/policy-2.cf", }; } body file control lets you specify additional inputs from any file that’s included in the policy and those files can include other files.
Ever want to run just a one or a few select bundles from your policy?
While developing policy it’s common to run cf-agent -KI so that you can quickly iterate on changes and the run the policy without locks. But if you are focused on select bundles you may not need the full policy to run, you can use the --bundlesequence option to specify one or more bundles overriding the bundlesequence defined in body common control.
Ever wanted to make sure a promise only runs if some other promise has succeeded?
Consider this contrived example with two reports type promises, It's Friday! and I love CFEngine Feature Friday. Per normal ordering1, these two promises will be emitted in the written order.
/tmp/feature-friday-7.cf bundle agent feature_friday { reports: "It's Friday, Friday"; "Gotta get down on Friday"; } command cf-agent --no-lock --bundlesequence feature_friday --file /tmp/feature-friday-7.cf output R: It's Friday! R: I love CFEngine Feature Friday. If we want them in the opposite order, we could either change the order or define classes based on the results of the promises. But today’s feature, depends_on, lets us influence the ordering using a more lightweight method via handle.
Will your policy work? cf-promises can check the CFEngine policy for syntax errors and give you an overview of the host’s context.
It’s always a good idea to check your policy for syntax errors.
Consider this policy file:
/tmp/feature-friday-6.cf bundle agent feature_friday { reports: "$(this.promise_filename)" printfile => cat( "$(this.promise_filename)" ) } Can you spot the error? Let’s see if cf-promises can help:
command cf-promises -f /tmp/feature-friday-6.cf output /tmp/feature-friday-6.cf:6:2: error: syntax error } ^ /tmp/feature-friday-6.cf:6:2: error: Check previous line, Expected ';', got '}' } ^ error: There are syntax errors in policy files The output tells us that there is a syntax error near line 6, column 2. A semicolon (;) was expected but instead, a closing curly brace (}) was found. We are missing the semicolon that terminates the promise for bundle feature_friday_6 which is called as a methods promise.
Do you maintain multiple policy sets? Do you leverage policy written by others? Ever wished for an easier way to upgrade your policy framework? cfbs can help to improve all of these cases.
cfbs is a command line tool that aims to help simplify managing a policy set and working with CFEngine Build, a website for finding and sharing modules. A policy set usually - but not always - builds on top of some base, like the Masterfiles Policy Framework (MPF). Custom policy is added on top, and you’re off to the races. When a new version of CFEngine is released, the best practice is to upgrade the MPF (assuming you are using it) as the first step in the upgrade process. If you have not modified the MPF, re-integrating the custom policy on top of the new MPF is a relatively straightforward process. If you have modified the MPF it’s 1) something you need to know that you did and 2) a process of managing your diffs against the newer version of the MPF.
What’s the easiest way to install cfengine? Have you heard of cf-remote?
cf-remote was born out of a developer’s itch for an easy way to get CFEngine installed on some host for testing. We have featured cf-remote in several posts1 since it was first released in 2019, but today is Friday, so let’s review its features.
Overview cf-remote (available via the Python Package Index) primarily targets installing CFEngine on a remote host, but it also provides some related conveniences including:
When you want to inspect both the return code and output from a command execresult_as_data() might be the function you are searching for.
Most CFEngine policy writers have used execresult() and returnszero(). They are useful when you want to do something based on the output of a command or based on its successful execution (returning zero). For example:
/tmp/feature-friday-3.cf bundle agent __main__ { vars: "hostname" string => execresult( "$(paths.hostname)", "useshell" ); classes: "my_command_returned_zero" expression => returnszero( "$(paths.hostname)", "noshell" ); reports: "$(hostname)"; my_command_returned_zero:: "$(paths.hostname) returned 0"; } command cf-agent --no-lock --log-level info --file /tmp/feature-friday-3.cf output precision-5570 R: precision-5570 R: /bin/hostname returned 0 But, sometimes, you care about specific return codes. However, you might also want to consider the output from a command. execresult_as_data() facilitates inspecting both output and return code from a command’s execution, by returning a data structure. Let’s take a look.
Ever wanted to manipulate a string - temporarily - for an individual promise? Check out the with attribute and its special, $(with) variable.
Sometimes you need some variation on a string for a specific case. Traditionally, to achieve this you’d simply define another variable.
Here is a contrived example:
I have a string, nginx and I want to emit a report that contains both the string itself and the upper case version of the string.
Looking for a way to concisely set a variable conditionally? Have you heard of ifelse()?
In CFEngine, traditionally class expressions are used to constrain promises to different contexts. Setting a variable to different values based on context might look like this:
/tmp/feature-friday-1.cf bundle agent __main__ { vars: "MyVariable" string => "My Default value"; redhat_8|centos_8|rocky_8:: "MyVariable" string => "My value for EL 8"; ubuntu_22:: "MyVariable" string => "My value for Ubuntu 22"; any:: "MyVariable" string => "My value on Friday", if => "Friday"; reports: "It's $(sys.date) and I am running on $(sys.os_release[PRETTY_NAME])"; "MyVariable is '$(MyVariable)'"; } command cf-agent --no-lock --log-level info --file /tmp/feature-friday-1.cf output R: It's Mon Mar 11 12:36:41 2024 and I am running on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS R: MyVariable is 'My value for Ubuntu 22' That’s great, lots of flexibility, but with an increasing number of options the policy can get quite long and it’s easier for a human interpreter to lose track of the context. The same can be achieved in a single statement using ifelse().
